Comments on: Evaluating ISO 30401 standard: Part 1 – What has changed since the draft? https://realkm.com/2019/01/21/evaluating-iso-30401-standard-part-1-what-has-changed-since-the-draft/ Evidence based. Practical results. Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:03:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2 By: Pavel Kraus https://realkm.com/2019/01/21/evaluating-iso-30401-standard-part-1-what-has-changed-since-the-draft/#comment-37029 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:03:03 +0000 https://realkm.com/?p=14214#comment-37029 I would be interested if KM communities like the Swiss Knowledge Management Forum or Gesellschaft für Wissensmanagement (GfWM) habe been contacted regarding some of the definitions. Currently, I am not aware of this.

For example in 2009 six KM communities in the German speaking Europe have mutually agreed on a KM glossary with the top 50 terms:
https://www.skmf.net/en/resources/glossary/

It might be beneficial to collaborate, so that the norm receives wider acceptance among the KM professionals 🙂

]]>