Analysis & counterpoints
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (section 6): Global communities
The last section of the series is dedicated to ideas of community and global community in scholarly communication paradigms.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 5.5): The pasts, presents, and futures of SciELO
SciELO Director Abel Packer gives an informed perspective on one of the longest-standing and most widespread open-access platforms on the…
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 5.4): Toward linked open data for Latin America
Becerril-García and Aguado-López contend that technological innovations can contribute to a more integrated knowledge ecosystem.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 5.3): Reading scholarship digitally
Martin Paul Eve asks what it means to think of scholarship as data.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 5.2): The platformisation of open
Ways in which new technological constructions function as platforms, both enclosing and elevating scholarship, but with a dark side.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 5.1): Infrastructural experiments and the politics of open access
Scholarly communication infrastructures may constitute sites of experimentation.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (section 5): Infrastructures and platforms
The fifth section of the series looks at infrastructures and platforms.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 4.4): The dangers of open access archives
Archives traffic in sensitive, dangerous material, so István Rév argues that they cannot publicly reveal all their secrets.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 4.3): Digital humanities and print-centered communications
Print-centered scholarly communication prevents migration to more open digital modes.
-
Open access to scholarly knowledge in the digital era (chapter 4.2): Preserving the past for the future – Whose past? Everyone’s future
Challenging current values and power structures to create a more inclusive record of knowledge creation and preservation.
